GF/Smiley,
Any of you guys ever worked up a cap list to fatten up the stock tx/rx audio bandwidth on an older HF rig? I've seen cap mods for a Kenwood TS-440S.
I've tried feeding ACC1 (definitely improves fidelity) but I can't get the same "level" before it distorts that I can via the front mic jack, dunno why.
I was thinking of fattening up the caps, I found a guy on qrz who claims to have done this but does not have the instructions he followed anymore but said it smoothed out the receive and transmit nicely.
http://www.ko4bb.com/Manuals/ICOM/IC-735.pdf
fattening stock tx/rx audio bandwidth on IC-735
The radio has a pot on the back that says "mic tone" all the way clockwise makes it rather tinny, all the way counterclockwise takes the highs out and adds lows/mids. I've tried adjusting while listening to another radio with a Heil ICM going into the front of the radio and can get an "ok" middle of the road sound, but nothing to write home about.
In the service manual is says AM TX does not go through any particular filter if I'm reading this correctly. So changing bypass and coupling caps could yield good results?
http://www.radiomanual.info/schemi/IC735_serv.pdf
http://www.radiomanual.info/schemi/IC735_serv.pdf
Here's a better copy of the schematic for anyone interested in helping me take a stab at this
It's in this directory, for some reason it doesn't work when I post a direct link to it http://www.w0btu.com/files/misc/Icom/IC ... ce%20Info/
It's in this directory, for some reason it doesn't work when I post a direct link to it http://www.w0btu.com/files/misc/Icom/IC ... ce%20Info/
- Goldfinger
- Site Maintenance
- Posts: 3849
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:27 am
- Location: Beaver State
I just can't stand the layout of Icom schematics. Lumping 50 circuit paths through one line on the schematic is idiotic at best. (maybe because I am old school and like complete schematics) Looking at the PL board, the only cap I see that might limit TX lows is C232. C234 could be made smaller for more highs.
wwpdx
wwpdx.com
wwpdx.com
Hey Thanks GoldFinger,
What do you think about the "tone control" pot - would eliminating it increase usable bandwidth or do the opposite? As stock, it's always inline and turning it all the way clockwise rolls the lows off and turns the highs up, turning it counter clockwise does the opposite. I was thinking removing it would give me better highs + lows together.
The two caps you mentioned, are they on the "main" or "pl" section? (they re-use resistor and cap #'s on both boards! what the heck) what are their stock value and what would you suggest bumping them to?
Is it apparent to you or not if the SSB filter is inline during AM TX? I can't tell one way or the other.
Thanks again for your help! You are tha man! :p
What do you think about the "tone control" pot - would eliminating it increase usable bandwidth or do the opposite? As stock, it's always inline and turning it all the way clockwise rolls the lows off and turns the highs up, turning it counter clockwise does the opposite. I was thinking removing it would give me better highs + lows together.
The two caps you mentioned, are they on the "main" or "pl" section? (they re-use resistor and cap #'s on both boards! what the heck) what are their stock value and what would you suggest bumping them to?
Is it apparent to you or not if the SSB filter is inline during AM TX? I can't tell one way or the other.
Thanks again for your help! You are tha man! :p